May 12, 2013
Posted in Civil Society, Impact Measurement, Politics of volunteering, Role definition, volunteer experience tagged Civil Society, community and voluntary sector, community-led development, Organisation development, Social Investment at 5:35 am by Sue Hine
Earlier this week Volunteering New Zealand issued an invitation on FaceBook to consider the ethos of volunteering and the meaning of ‘giving time’ for the common good. It was in response to a news item about Christchurch youth who had pledged four hours of volunteering in return for tickets to a music festival –The Concert – held late last year. Except around 600 pledges have not been fulfilled, and according to the terms and conditions of the pledge (clearly stated) they are to be named and shamed. They can expect to be outed on The Concert’s website.
There is absolutely no doubt the people who have participated in Student Army projects deserve recognition and a thanksgiving for the work they have been doing in quake-ravaged Christchurch. From all accounts the concert was a great success.
The website includes clear information on whys and wherefores, including a FAQ section which defines volunteering as performing a service freely and for no charge.
Here’s the rub. There may be no fees for volunteering, though there is always an opportunity cost for the donation of time. The pay-back for that time can be offered in a huge number of ways, from a regular smile and ‘thank you’ to formal functions and speechifying, not to mention a lot of feel-good factors and personal gains. But to offer a tangible (and highly desirable) carrot suggests the volunteering response is not given altogether freely. What to do when the offer is not fulfilled? Just let it go and mumble-mumble about free-loaders, or do the public name-and-shame? To be fair, the 600 unfulfilled pledges represent only 7.5% of the 8000 people who created 50,000 hours of volunteer service. And if they are outed, will public humiliation put them off volunteering for ever? Will that matter? Is going public with non-volunteering so different from the bad-mouthing that a poorly- managed volunteer programme can attract?
Alternatively, will volunteers elsewhere now expect enticing carrots when they offer their time, something a bit beyond the annual Christmas party?
Let me add these questions to voluntary sector conditions I have been noting in my posts in recent months:
- A Register for violations of Volunteer Rights is suggested for Australia. (Leading to a Union of Volunteers, as one comment has suggested?)
- A major event is politicised to create a legacy for volunteering, to the point where £5million Lottery Funds are allocated “to be spent on Olympic inspired volunteering schemes”.
- New ways to fund and provide social services (Social Bonds, Social Finance) are being discussed, without consideration of volunteer input.
- Lack of understanding and appreciation of volunteers and the potential of volunteering are highlighted in recent academic research.
- The focus on measuring social service impact and outcomes is not doing any favours for volunteering, specially where the quality of relationships makes the critical difference to outcomes for individuals.
- The rise of Obligatory Volunteering is also evident, including internships, compulsory community service and conditional welfare entitlements. Which is where the Christchurch Concert pledge fits in: ‘free will’ is not so free after all.
- Corporate responsibility and ‘workplace volunteering’ can sometimes be more self-serving than real social responsibility.
- In addition we should take into account trends in volunteer preferences, like micro-volunteering, time-limited and task-focused assignments, and time-banking.
There we have a heap of shifts in practice to impact on the ethos of volunteering, and many of them influenced by Government directives. Government is even supporting a new approach to community development with funding and advice. It is disappointing to see how the Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector is ignoring the long history and proud achievements of ‘community-led development’ that happens without any form of government intervention.
So it seems the ethos of volunteering has enlarged its sphere to include more formalised, more structured practice, and a variety of practice modes. Volunteering is certainly less central to service delivery for many NGOs than the volunteering I grew up with, decades ago. That’s OK – nothing is forever, and I’m getting used to living with constant change, in organisations and in volunteering.
But, and it’s a big but: formalised volunteering programmes, complete with policies and professional management of volunteers, are pretty small bikkies in NFP statistics. Ninety per cent of volunteer organisations in New Zealand do not employ paid staff. Think about it: that’s close to 90,000 organisations that do their own thing, working in their communities for the common good, and doing good, pitching in where needs must, scratching for funds, and keeping their services going anyway.
So the ethos of volunteering, performing a service freely and for no charge, has not gone away. It has just got a bit larger. Denouncing volunteers who do not fulfil commitments is not yet within the boundaries of regular practice, not yet in the spirit of volunteering, even though volunteers are free to tarnish an organisation’s reputation if they don’t get the experience they expect.
As any yachtie knows, a shift in the wind means you have to trim the sails, and adjust the course to make the most of the wind-power. That’s the excitement of sailing, being at the mercy of wind and ocean currents, and mastering your way around these forces. Volunteering can shift with the wind too, yet will keep enough of its core to maintain a true course.
Permalink
March 10, 2013
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Motivation, Organisation responsibilities, Valuing Volunteers tagged community and voluntary sector, community leadership, community-led development, Competency, Job satisfaction at 2:57 am by Sue Hine
Last weekend I followed my Sunday habit to visit the fruit and vegetable market held at the local primary school. You have to admire the enterprise of schools these days for hiring out their space and facilities to Churches, Sunday sports for kids, and for the market. That’s what you have to do to maintain a cash-strapped “free” education.
At the school entry I encountered a woman struggling to open the security gate. The gate had been a puzzle for me on previous weeks but I had it sorted now. I opened the gate for the woman and remarked “We never had to master this sort of barrier when we went to school”. The woman nodded vigorously, acknowledging both the import of my comment and our shared age bracket.
I went on up the path, the back entrance to the school. There was another security gate to gain access to classroom areas and the market stalls.
The gates were not so big they could not be opened by the average-sized six or seven year old child standing on tip-toes. They offered more of an impediment than a barrier, and certainly no real obstacle to adult visitors. But when a couple of four year old boys leave their day-care centre their adventure is called an ‘escape’. From what, you might ask.
I start thinking, again. I am really bothered that we have become so dependent on legislation and regulations around hazards and safety precautions that kids these days never get to use their instincts for self-preservation, never learn to evaluate risk and the limits on their own capacity. It’s all done for them by adults who bend over backwards to ensure nothing bad happens. No wonder teenagers think they are bullet-proof when they get behind the wheel of a car, or get tanked-up to go on the town.
The community sector is also plagued by regulation, as I described a few months back. Volunteers are known to become tetchy when restrictions seem unreasonable. Over the past ten years I have noticed a creep of limitations placed on the roles and tasks of volunteers: can’t have them doing personal cares for people in a clinical setting; huge risks if you let volunteers loose on Facebook; volunteers are not the same as staff; can’t ask them to do extra; but we’ll keep them on to work the phones and do the cleaning.
I exaggerate, just a little. For all the stories of restrictions there are also accounts of volunteers going beyond the call of duty, and many times we can see how collective volunteer actions have created a community fabric.
You see, that’s the bounty of volunteering. Volunteers get up and go, they can experiment with new ideas and different ways of doing things. They see a need or a gap in community services and they are free and flexible enough to devise an immediate and sometimes a long-term response to the presenting problem. They are risk-takers, big-time. That’s how our major NGOs and NFPs got started in the first place – read their histories.
So please, do not wrap volunteers in cotton-wool. Give them credit for intelligence and sensitivity and responsibility, and especially for their humanity. Give them space to be innovative and creative in the best tradition of community development. And remember that ‘humanity’ involves trust and respect and dignity – qualities that are never going to be measurable in pursuit of volunteer impact, yet can be diminished by over-regulation.
Perhaps I should have titled this piece ‘Stretching Boundaries’. I do not wish to make light of school security, nor of the tragedies that have created the armoury of protection for students and stringent screening for visitors. Nor am I suggesting volunteering should be turned into a laissez-faire free-for-all. I just want to make sure that too much bureaucracy does not shut down the whole point of volunteering.
Permalink
January 20, 2013
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Annual Review, Best Practice, Managers Matter tagged business, Civil Society, community leadership, community-led development, Managers of Volunteers, Organisation development, Qualitative outcomes, social entrepreneur at 3:43 am by Sue Hine
It’s that time of year for reflection, to look into the pool of 2012 and to assess the prospects for volunteers and their managers in 2013.
Looking good from last year was the continuing increase in numbers of volunteers, especially from youth cohorts. There was a lot more corporate volunteering too. I was heartened by the increased support and recognition for International Volunteer Managers’ Day (November 5) and for International Volunteer’s Day (December 5). And it seemed there was greater and more effective use of the e-waves than previously – for recruiting volunteers, for creative news reporting on volunteering, and for producing better and brighter organisation websites.
Volunteering New Zealand stepped up with the publication of Best Practice Guidelines for Volunteer-Involving Organisations, outlining a steer on supporting managers of volunteers, getting the best from a volunteer programme and enhancing organisational attraction for volunteers and paid staff. I am looking forward to the next publication, the Learning and Development Pathway for managers of volunteers.
But there is no time to rest on our laurels. At the top of the search list for my blog, again, is Bad Volunteer Experience. Again, it shows how many people miss out on good practice in management of volunteers. More disheartening are the continuing accounts of raw deals for managers of volunteers, overburdened and under-appreciated, by organisations that should know better. So work on promoting and educating on the basics – the essentials – of managing volunteers will continue to be a priority in the coming months. Business as usual, you might say.
I picked up some signals last year that are going to be my worry-beads for 2013. I am not alone in my concerns:
Volunteering is becoming more transient, more promiscuous, more blurred
Convergence between NFPs and the business sector is not the panacea for all ills
Volunteering is an unloved child generally but was particularly so in 2012
Volunteers are demanding to be led – not managed
Resources are being drawn away from volunteering for investment in fundraising
These quotes come from different sources and could all be placed under the rubric of The Great Unsettlement. Here are the features I reckon are the ‘big-picture’ issues:
- Corporate social responsibility has spawned corporate volunteering, and also sponsorship and partnerships with NFP organisations. Good stuff, and sensible in cash-strapped times. Except there is potential risk to maintaining organisation branding and identity if relations with a corporate business are not well-managed. Worse is the way volunteering and the management of an ongoing volunteer programme seem to be sidelined in preference to scoring big business patronage. This is particularly evident in marketing and managing fundraising events.
- ‘Social enterprise’ has risen in popularity stakes as a business model for social outcomes. Yes, good for the national economy, and more sexy than ordinary everyday volunteering – which (if you need reminding) has promoted social outcomes for generations. I sigh, because the definition of volunteering is up for debate, again.
- Government out-sourcing of social services has turned many NFPs into NGOs over the past 30 years, introducing an active if unequal interface between government and community. Proposals for new models of funding such as social bonds will put a whole new agenda in front of many organisations, again challenging the place and the contribution of a volunteer programme.
- Accountability, the business of measuring performance, not just inputs and outputs in dollar terms, has been around for a while now. The current attention to Social Return on Investment (SROI) is more serious, more intense and we’d better get to know about it. Except the impact of human service delivery is difficult to formulate, expensive to administer, and risks turning volunteering into a commodity.
The political and economic environment rules – OK? So it seems, and in the process that part of social structure that is called Civil Society, or the Third Sector, or simply ‘the community’ becomes marginalised. What’s a manager of volunteers to do?
Top of my wish-list for this year is to get beyond the hand-wringing and to turn questions of ‘what can we do?’ into ‘how do we get there?’ Notice how ‘we’ reminds us of the collective and the collaborative approach to action. There is the stimulus, to seek out allies in local networks and to enlist support from the progressive organisations that were pilots for the Best Practice Guidelines. Take some leafs from marketing and fundraising strategies: cultivate news media contacts, and never let up on social media plugs. Become social entrepreneurs in the sense of community-building for social innovation, for volunteering and volunteer organisations.
There are already pockets of volunteering enterprise in various communities. Just think what volunteering could become if we stitched those pockets into overalls. There is our challenge for 2013: to gain a stake in the future we need to stake a claim, on our terms, for the territory of community and for volunteering.
Permalink
August 26, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Leadership, Managers Matter, Organisational gains from volunteering, Recognition of Volunteering tagged Civil Society, community and voluntary sector, community-led development, Leadership skills, Management skills, Managers of Volunteers, Organisation development, Philanthropy, social entrepreneur at 2:12 am by Sue Hine
I’m doing a double-take on the word Enterprise. In recent years the word has been thrown around like it is newly-minted. Yet the business of enterprise has been around for centuries, since history began. Business entrepreneurs have driven industry and economic growth for generations. They invented consumerism, though I daresay the global market of people avid for the new and different accelerated the process, and the profits. Entrepreneurs and enterprise have created corporate and multi-national organisations, and, let us acknowledge, contributed to the GFC (Global Financial Crisis) in less-than-honourable dealings.
I am sobering-up from last week’s high at the conference on Social Enterprise. Yes, creating a business that turns a profit for social interests is a sea change from creating wealth for private shareholders. And yes, there are a heap of good intentions and good results in ‘doing good’ and collaborating for sustainable outcomes.
Here’s the Big But:
• I did not hear acknowledgement or recognition of NFP organisations, though their representatives dominated the ranks of those attending the conference
• Volunteering and management of volunteers did not get a mention
• And everybody ignored history
Here are my Reminders:
• Social Movements have stimulated more social change than any corporate enterprise. (OK, that claim could be debated…) I am thinking of organisations and programmes established on the back of global activism in Civil Rights, Feminism, Disability, the Environment and hundreds of others at local community level. Or cast your mind back to early crusaders on slavery and poverty, and to pioneers like Florence Nightingale and Henri Dunant.
• It was Community-based Social Enterprise that created local support services and long-standing organisations and community change – achieved by Volunteers, and funded in the past simply by cake stalls and raffles.
• NFP organisations have been operating Social Profit enterprises since Oxfam opened its first High Street op-shop – though it seems most NFPs continue to rely on philanthropic largesse or the caprice of a government contract.
Operating a charity is not the same as running a for-profit business. Yet financial stability is of primary importance for both sectors. Just think what a community organisation could achieve if it could rely on a sustainable funding stream. That’s where social enterprise could really be Doing Real Good.
And here’s another thing: I read that “strong leadership is crucial for social enterprises”, including a list of recommended attributes:
• Have passion and purpose
• Trust and be trustworthy
• Be pragmatic and prudent
• Share the lead
• Never miss the opportunity to praise and say thank you
Which sounds to me just like the qualities of many a worthy manager of volunteers. When I think about the enterprise involved in running a volunteer programme I would call the managers Social Entrepreneurs. And even if volunteers do not come for free they can reap huge profits in terms of goodwill and service delivery, and in fund-raising.
Permalink
August 19, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Conference communication, Language tagged Civil Society, community-led development, Organisation development, Social Enterprise, social innovation at 4:47 am by Sue Hine
There were two days this week of intensive concentration. Two days of learning new ways of expressing old ideas, two days of interpreting new inspirations for a new age.
There were two events: one was a national conference, and the other a brief breakfast session at Parliament hosted by Jacinda Adern MP, on behalf of ComVoices. Both covered common elements: community engagement and citizenship; the business of funding community projects and enterprise; and different models of operation.
Nothing is forever. We live in a world of constant change. There’s something new every day. Yes, I know all the clichés. But there is something more going on here.
The meanings of ordinary words are revitalised:
• Citizenship is you and me and the responsibilities we have to our community and to each other;
• Participation is being engaged in our communities and networks, and engaged in the process of change;
• Sustainability is creating something that is not just a one-off attempt, and it is also the big word in better management of our environment;
• Collaboration and Partnership will drive the operations of community groups in times of austerity; and are the key facilitators in developing a social enterprise.
Hackneyed terms and phrases are revisited and rephrased:
• The old catch-cry of Making a Difference morphs into Doing Real Good, implying there are tangible results in what you do. (And begging the question of defining what we mean by ‘Real Good’.) Well, we are learning fast about outcomes and results-based funding conditions.
• Community gets to be described and understood as a philosophy, a collective value, and not just a blanket neutral term for everyone out there, or the generalisation for why our organisation exists. There are many different forms of ‘community’.
When we turn these words and ideas into action there is a whole new vocabulary to learn, and new ways of doing business. The new vocabulary begins with Social Enterprise, and the new business model is based on collaboration and partnership between business, philanthropy, government agencies and communities and community organisations.
That’s the beauty of the new ways of thinking: we can escape from our silos of Public, Private and Third or Non-Profit Sectors (and eliminate perceptions of community as third-rate, or non-anything) to find the new view and new solutions. It’s happening now, somewhere close to you. Go find out more, and be a part of the change. Or read about the international trend for NGOs to embrace profit-making social enterprises.
Going on three hundred and fifty years ago there was an earlier Enlightenment, a period of awakening in Europe, of the beginnings of formal science, philosophy, economics and the rise of capitalism and industrialisation. It was also called the Age of Reason, because it was argued that rational thinking provided more answers to the mysteries of life than religious beliefs. One of the facilitators of this new age was the invention of the Coffee House, where you could enjoy the new stimulant brought by the merchant traders from Africa and South America. Here was the place where intellectuals met to discuss the issues of the day, to form political policies and to plot the French Revolution.
Next time you go to a business meeting at your favourite café give some thought to how your discussion might influence the new Enlightenment.
Permalink
July 29, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Leadership, Organisational gains from volunteering, Recognition of Volunteering, Valuing Volunteers tagged community and voluntary sector, community-led development, good governance, leadership, Management skills, Managers of Volunteers, Organisation Mission, volunteer contributions at 4:57 am by Sue Hine
I have been rabbiting on for ages about the relevance of volunteering and the importance of good management of volunteers in the community and voluntary sector. I have been on about organisations that just don’t get volunteering, about boards and management that take volunteers for granted, and who fail to recognise that volunteers might be just the true deliverers of organisation vision and values.
Volunteers live the organisation’s mission; they have organisational values at heart; and they put up their hands to work for free without expectation of a pay package or other reward.
What if, I venture to ask, what if we turn running the organisation over to volunteers?
I can hear the objections shouted down the e-waves:
- The board members / trustees are all volunteers! Isn’t that enough?
- Volunteers are part-timers, mere bit-players in service delivery
- Volunteers are unreliable, take time out, have other commitments and priorities
- Volunteers do not have the necessary professional knowledge and skills
- Come on – volunteers are not the answer to everything!
- Lots of them are merely getting work experience, or fulfilling their employer’s obligations for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
- Open Sesame to organisational chaos!
To which I respond:
- The role of Board members / Trustees is governance, overall direction and decision-making responsibility – well-placed to ensure best practice service delivery
- If you regard volunteers in your organisation as ‘bit-players’ then you do not deserve them
- Many community services are delivered entirely by volunteers – and highly valued for their standard of service
- Yes, volunteers are free to come and go: respect that freedom and you get loyalty and long-term commitment
- When volunteers know and understand why they join your organisation, they are demonstrating the real meaning of being ‘professional’, and all the knowledge and skills that go with that
- Volunteers are powerful contributors to community development, community integration, and the building of Civil Society
- And by being exposed to volunteer experience those people engaged for work experience or CSR events are likely to continue volunteering
- As for the chaos, welcome to tumultuous energy of the world of Management of Volunteers and the community and voluntary sector
What if, I ask again, what if the manager of volunteers was promoted to Chief Executive?
I can hear the gob-smacked responses from here! Sure there’s a load of extra responsibility and more things to think about. But think about it a bit more:
- The manager of volunteers is well-versed in management and leadership, especially in being responsible for more people than most Chief Executives in the community sector. [See Susan J Ellis, Non-Profit World 1986, 4/2 - Maximising the Potential of the Director of Volunteers; and 1996 – What Makes the Position of Volunteer Programme Manager (VPM) Unique? (Adapted from Chapter 4, From the Top Down: The Executive Role in Volunteer Program Success)]
- The manager of volunteers is creative and flexible; has to be a strategic thinker and really good at time management; has an amazing network of colleagues and game-players to call on, and really good mentor support.
- The manager of volunteers knows the organisation inside out; works across all service areas; has effective working relationships with senior managers.
- The manager of volunteers is committed to organisation mission and vision and knows how to engage volunteers to put these into practice.
You might still think I am in fantasy-land. Not so, if you read Claire Teal’s arguments about the status of management of volunteers:
[S]o many of us seem to simultaneously lament the lack of value given to our role, but also resist any real attempt to do anything about this. In many ways we seem to want to have our cake (a higher value placed on our role) and eat it too (not change anything we’re doing).
This on-going self-deprecation has to be turned around! If you really object to a volunteer take-over, or to the manager of volunteers becoming your Chief Executive, go read Betty Stalling’s counterfactuals about Volunteer Program Champions.
That is the What If challenge for organisations and their managers of volunteers. That’s the world of difference a What If question can make.
Permalink
June 10, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Leadership, Leading Volunteers, Managers Matter, Professionalism, Recognition of Volunteering tagged business, community and voluntary sector, community-led development, cost benefit analysis, leadership, Managers of Volunteers, OCVS, Organisation development, Philanthrocapitalism, Qualitative outcomes, social capital, social entrepreneur, Social Investment at 4:06 am by Sue Hine
Nothing can be certain, said Benjamin Franklin in a letter written in 1789, except death and taxes. I am surprised he did not include ‘change’ in his aphorism. He lived through a fair bit of historical change himself, in his enterprising career and as a Founding Father of United States, and he must surely have seen what was coming to France when he wrote his letter.
Well – change in the not-for-profit sector, and in volunteering, is all around the world at present. I read the exhortations for managers of volunteers to get up to speed with social media – for everything from organising fundraising events to volunteer recruitment, and for regular organisation promos. And for networking and conversations on common interests for managers of volunteers.
I read about the impact of generational differences and the statistics on who volunteers and what for and why. Short-term, time-limited assignments please. A specific focus, relevant to my skills. Or please, some work experience that will get me a job (when you give me a reference). There are significant increases in prospective volunteers out there. They are clamouring for roles – particularly the younger age groups. And despite the huge bubble of older people, the baby-boomers, newly retired, this cohort is not rushing to fill the ranks of volunteers.
There is no denying the global financial crisis (GFC) is creating change, forcing governments to downsize, to rethink priorities for community support and development.
Change is coming from another direction too: the ethos of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is generating waves of corporate volunteering. Corporates are going beyond conventional sponsorship and funding grants: active partnerships with non-profits are being pursued. Even ‘Philanthropy’ gets a new connotation, loses its original glow of generosity, munificence and beneficence. Now philanthropy is about venture capital for social change.
A whole new way of looking at the community and voluntary sector is evolving. The social value of volunteering is increasingly seen in economic terms. We trumpet the significant contribution volunteering and the NFP sector makes to GDP. We are trying to improve reporting on volunteer impact beyond numbers and hours and donations in kind. We look for ways to measure the social return on investment (SROI) in volunteering. The word ‘social’ starts appearing in front of words I thought only bankers and accountants used: capital, innovation, investment – and even New Zealand’s OCVS has a raft of papers and information social finance and social enterprise. What will these terms mean for volunteers and
the community sector? They sound good, but will they really do good?
Well – if we want to get volunteering and management of volunteers properly appreciated and recognised by those holding the purse-strings, then we need to learn and understand this language. We need to be able to promote our causes and to argue our cases on an equal footing.
Yet in all the heady engagement between the not-for-profit sector and business and government, and with current trends in volunteering, I have not seen specific comment on the future for managers of volunteers. Yes, we need to ride with changing times, adapt programmes to fit with the expectations of new generations of volunteers, be flexible innovative, creative. But no-one has raised a direct question of what an alliance between public, private and community sectors might mean for managers of volunteers, and what will happen to volunteering further down the track.
What if CSR becomes the dominant source of volunteers, a formal process that may require a different style of management? Different from the basic model of engaging individuals who want to ‘help’ add value to an organisation’s services?
That’s when managers of volunteers need to rise to Rob Jackson’s challenge: instead of organisations headed by “someone who knows how to make money … what we need is people-raising skills” (my emphasis).
We have been people-raising for several decades. We have adapted to major change in the past. Let’s demonstrate for the new era the know-how and can-do of our management expertise.
Permalink
May 20, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Celebrations, Good news stories, Recognition of Volunteering, Valuing Volunteers, volunteer experience tagged Civil Society, community and voluntary sector, community-led development, Managers of Volunteers, Volunteer Awareness Week, Volunteer Centres, Volunteer recruitment, Volunteering NZ at 1:31 am by Sue Hine
In all the gloom and doom of national and international economics the volunteer industry keeps on keeping on. Numbers of volunteers continue to increase, now spread across a wider age range than in generations past, and across different sectors. The range of volunteer activities broadens as organisations raise their expectations and the standards of volunteer programmes, as the manager of volunteers becomes recognised as a leader holding a pivotal role in developing and maintaining volunteer services.
There could be quite a number of people wanting to tell me “it ain’t necessarily so”. Somebody is bound to point out how volunteer recruitment and retention is so often the most wanted topic on Volunteer Centre training schedules. There are lots of reasons for this: turnover in people working with volunteers, a lack of specific training on management of volunteers, getting behind the times in new ways to attract volunteers, and the different expectations of volunteers – you know, using social media, getting upbeat in advertising, creating new roles for volunteers.
There will always be room for improvement. And there are always people out there thinking about volunteering who need a bit of encouragement.
Like a conversation I had last week that went like this:
- I am asked: Are you working, or retired?
- I talk a bit about being involved in the Management of Volunteers Project, and why. Of course it’s a great opportunity to do a bit of a sell, on volunteering and on the importance of good management for volunteers.
- Oh, she says a little wistfully, I’ve thought about volunteering, and I could ‘cos I work part-time. I do like shopping, she adds, eyes lighting up at the thought of being a volunteer that got to browse the malls and shopping meccas.
- Well, I advise, it’s really important that you get a job that you like, and managers try to match your interests.
So then I went on about how to connect, how to find out what volunteer positions were available. Easy as, I said – you can do it all on the computer. Or you could go to Facebook – there are regular inserts on volunteer opportunities. Or go visit a Volunteer Centre. That’s where you can get registered and get referred to places that could meet your interests and expectations.
I don’t know if I have enabled one more person to join the ranks of volunteers, but at least I have taken the opportunity to offer some good leads and some encouragement to give it a go.
In just four weeks’ time New Zealand will be alive with exhibitions and events to promote and to celebrate volunteering. Volunteer Awareness Week will have something for everyone. This annual programme serves to illustrate the breadth and depth of volunteering and all the organisations that go to make our Civil Society.
Volunteers are everywhere. When I go to catch a bus I walk past the Community Centre which is always alive with people meeting for community purposes. Around the corner I can find the local Community Garden, and further on is the Citizens Advice Bureau staffed by warm and welcoming volunteers. When I go walking on one of the many trails around Wellington I see the work of volunteers who have been landscaping a desolate environment, restoring native plants and trees, recovering a waterway to re-introduce native fish. During the weekend I’ll be watching some kids run around a cold and muddy sports field, and I will be admiring the volunteers who are team coaches, managers and referees, and the ones who organise the rota for half-time oranges and the jersey washing. My weekly community newspapers tell me more, about op-shops run by volunteers, about food collections for Food Banks, or a meal delivery service for new mums. Volunteers knock at my door, doing their stuff as collectors for a fund-raising appeal. Email newsletters turn up in my in-box, crafted by volunteers.
That’s the way of my community, just a small part of it. This year’s slogan for Volunteer awareness week is Building Communities through Volunteering. That’s what we do, and you can read more here.
Permalink
April 29, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture tagged Charities Commission, Civil Society, community and voluntary sector, community-led development, Philanthrocapitalism, Qualitative outcomes, social capital, social entrepreneur, social innovation, Social Investment at 9:44 pm by Sue Hine
I’ve been to a few meetings lately, listened to presentations and viewed the power point slides. They were not meetings about volunteering or volunteer management, but the information and ideas sure made me sit up and take notice.
Here is my take on some of the straws in the wind that have come my way.
- Demographic trends indicate a shrinking working-age population
We’ve heard about the dramatic increase of older populations for decades. On the flip side is a decline in people of working age, which will give us the benefit of lower unemployment. We are going to get ZPG without even trying. The bad news is a big revenue problem for government and a rise in resource demands. All this, on top of a national economy struggling to recover from the impact of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC).
NGOs, already struggling to maintain their funding base, will be under pressure to do more with less. In rural areas where population change will be greater community organisations will face shrinking resources, of both funding and volunteers. There are serious implications for national organisations providing outreach services in provincial areas. On the other hand there could be opportunities to work more closely with local government, to develop partnerships with other organisations and subsequent economies of scale.
- Collaboration, Participation, Innovation
These words are the catch-cry for change in the community sector, the drivers for action. Proposed changes in both central and local government offer an opportunity for community organisations to articulate a new view, to occupy a new space and to develop new coalitions. Yes!
Can we do it?
- Collaboration is the buzzword of the month
There are plenty of models to follow: community development partnerships, through community engagement, the effective use of social capital and linked with social enterprise. None of these words are new, but they gain increased currency in a time of sector uncertainty. What is new is the trend towards alliances with the business sector and philanthropic trusts. But I worry about collaboration, and whether it is another word for the public and private sectors to take control while proffering the hand of partnership.
- “A new phase of capitalism, where new ways of creating wealth are identified”
In all the talk of Social Investment and Social Impact and Outcomes it is difficult to see who benefits. Governments can transfer risks to the community sector. Social investment from the private sector could lead to creaming off the best of NFPs and ignoring others, thus creating new forms of underclass. It also leads to the Marketisation of Charities. That sounds more like a death knell for the sector’s capacity for innovation. When organisations become risk-aversive it is too easy to curtail services in areas where outcomes and impacts are less impressive. The spectre of ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor is resurrected, specially when funding gets tagged to results.
- “The community sector is not considered a peer of Government”
Too true, I sigh, and has been so for decades, despite terminology like Third Sector and concepts of Civil Society. Volunteers and their organisations might enjoy praise and platitudes of appreciation, but never do they get to be equals at negotiating tables.
So I am disappointed the recent report on public services makes never a mention of relations with NGOs, NFPs or the community sector. It is like these organisations do not exist.
Well, it is proclaimed, the Government and the community sector need to get to know each other better. They need to build mutual trust and understanding, not stand-off bargaining. They need to reduce the power imbalance, get a pay-off for both funders and recipients (not to mention the beneficiaries). I wish.
Yes, I know the NFP sector is complex. We struggle to establish a common definition and language, and to determine the essence of the sector. Yet the diversity of communities and organisations means a single voice and a unifying philosophy is unrealistic.
Yes, there is room for collaboration where there are shared interests. Yes, we need to break down the silos and patch protection. And Yes, we have been in the business of change for generations. Except this time it seems like the change is being done to us, and not in the spirit of community development.
To gain a stake in the future it we need to stake a claim, on our terms, for the territory of our communities and their missions.
Permalink
April 1, 2012
Posted in A Bigger Picture, Valuing Volunteers tagged community leadership, community-led development, Kia Tutahi, social capital, social entrepreneur, social innovation, Third Sector, volunteer awards at 4:33 am by Sue Hine
Last week’s review of national awards honouring volunteers pointed up the extent of voluntary activity outside the mainstream not-for-profit institutions, and generally beyond a formal volunteer programme. I was reminded of my long ago introduction to sociology, and early studies of New Zealand society.
Forty years ago I was reading about New Zealanders as ‘a nation of joiners’. Research in 1970 in a country town of 14,000 people found there were 200 organisations, and 60% of the population belonged to one or more of them. You could find similar patterns all over the country, and I was part of them.
Forty years ago academic research and writing never mentioned ‘volunteers’ or ‘volunteering’, despite the existence of health and social service organisations that had been active for many years, largely supported by volunteers. Organisations were lumped together as “voluntary associations”, regardless of purpose or function. Or they were pressure groups, sometimes regarded with suspicion by dismissive politicians. Our open political system, said one writer, “has what amounts to an unrecognised fourth estate” [after legislature, judiciary and administration]. Voluntary participation in communities was surely taken for granted.
At last count (2004) there were 97,000 non-profit organisations in New Zealand. More recent studies (2008) estimate that 67% of the non-profit workforce are volunteers, and that more than one third of the population aged 10 and over volunteer each year. It seems we are still a nation of joiners, though under changed circumstances.
Over the past twenty-five years Government has devolved responsibility for delivering many services to community-based organisations, and volunteers can play a large part in these. Government organisations like Sport NZ (formerly SPARC) and the Department of Conservation are directly engaged with volunteers and supporting volunteering. A formal relationship accord between government and communities of Aotearoa NewZealand was signed in 2010.
Terminology shifted too. We absorbed new labels and acronyms: non-governmental organisation (NGO); non-profit institution (NPI); and not-for-profit (NFP). Collectively, community-based organisations are tagged the Third Sector.
The focus on service delivery and ‘consumers’ and on accountability brought an attendant raft of regulations, eroding the real virtues of volunteer-involving organisations. Their capacity for developing creative solutions and experimenting with new practice methodologies was hard to fit into the new environment, even though volunteering and volunteers remained an essential part of an organisation’s operations. Neither did the new model enhance belonging and social connectedness in local communities.
“Voluntary associations” never really went away, but somehow dropped under the radar. We are still joiners, because we are hard-wired to the idea of community, to social connectedness. The philosophy of community is as old as – well – communities, and history is chequered with examples of community-led development and change on social, political and economic fronts.
So I should not be surprised to observe some winds of change over the past decade. Concepts of Civil Society and social capital are re-surfacing in mainstream discussion and actions. Social entrepreneurs are showing us the way to create sustainable change in our communities. We can even put a positive spin on NGOs by re-naming them Social Profit Organisations. And wouldn’t you know it: the theme for this year’s Volunteer Awareness Week is Building Communities through Volunteering.
There is much to encourage us in the present state of volunteering. National and local awards for volunteers are evidence of a depth of experience and commitment to communities of all kinds. “Voluntary Associations” deserve more air-time because their activities can build flourishing communities.
No doubt the next forty years will record more social and political change. I am in no doubt that “voluntary associations” will participate in that change, if not leading the charge.
Permalink