March 10, 2013

Breaking Bounds

Posted in A Bigger Picture, Motivation, Organisation responsibilities, Valuing Volunteers tagged , , , , at 2:57 am by Sue Hine

DSC06810Last weekend I followed my Sunday habit to visit the fruit and vegetable market held at the local primary school.  You have to admire the enterprise of schools these days for hiring out their space and facilities to Churches, Sunday sports for kids, and for the market.  That’s what you have to do to maintain a cash-strapped “free” education.

At the school entry I encountered a woman struggling to open the security gate.  The gate had been a puzzle for me on previous weeks but I had it sorted now.  I opened the gate for the woman and remarked “We never had to master this sort of barrier when we went to school”.  The woman nodded vigorously, acknowledging both the import of my comment and our shared age bracket.

I went on up the path, the back entrance to the school.  There was another security gate to gain access to classroom areas and the market stalls.

The gates were not so big they could not be opened by the average-sized six or seven year old child standing on tip-toes.  They offered more of an impediment than a barrier, and certainly no real obstacle to adult visitors.  But when a couple of four year old boys leave their day-care centre their adventure is called an ‘escape’.  From what, you might ask.

I start thinking, again.  I am really bothered that we have become so dependent on legislation and regulations around hazards and safety precautions that kids these days never get to use their instincts for self-preservation, never learn to evaluate risk and the limits on their own capacity.  It’s all done for them by adults who bend over backwards to ensure nothing bad happens.  No wonder teenagers think they are bullet-proof when they get behind the wheel of a car, or get tanked-up to go on the town.

The community sector is also plagued by regulation, as I described a few months back.  Volunteers are known to become tetchy when restrictions seem unreasonable.  Over the past ten years I have noticed a creep of limitations placed on the roles and tasks of volunteers: can’t have them doing personal cares for people in a clinical setting; huge risks if you let volunteers loose on Facebook; volunteers are not the same as staff; can’t ask them to do extra; but we’ll keep them on to work the phones and do the cleaning.

I exaggerate, just a little.  For all the stories of restrictions there are also accounts of volunteers going beyond the call of duty, and many times we can see how collective volunteer actions have created a community fabric.

You see, that’s the bounty of volunteering.  Volunteers get up and go, they can experiment with new ideas and different ways of doing things.  They see a need or a gap in community services and they are free and flexible enough to devise an immediate and sometimes a long-term response to the presenting problem.   They are risk-takers, big-time.  That’s how our major NGOs and NFPs got started in the first place – read their histories.

So please, do not wrap volunteers in cotton-wool.  Give them credit for intelligence and sensitivity and responsibility, and especially for their humanity.  Give them space to be innovative and creative in the best tradition of community development.  And remember that ‘humanity’ involves trust and respect and dignity – qualities that are never going to be measurable in pursuit of volunteer impact, yet can be diminished by over-regulation.

Perhaps I should have titled this piece ‘Stretching Boundaries’.  I do not wish to make light of school security, nor of the tragedies that have created the armoury of protection for students and stringent screening for visitors.  Nor am I suggesting volunteering should be turned into a laissez-faire free-for-all.  I just want to make sure that too much bureaucracy does not shut down the whole point of volunteering.

March 3, 2013

The Fruits of Our Labours

Posted in A Bigger Picture, Best Practice, Management of Volunteers Project, Professional Development, Valuing Volunteers tagged , , , , , at 3:15 am by Sue Hine

harvest-and-preserves-23441280255023VyNQMarch is the month for the beginning of autumn in my southern hemisphere, though current sunshine levels have not yet arrived at the ‘season of mists and mellow fruitfulness’.  We are getting close however, to harvesting a project begun more than three years ago.  In a couple of months Volunteering New Zealand will publish the Learning and Development Pathway, a guide to professional development for managers of volunteers.  This document will sit alongside the Best Practice Guidelines for volunteer-involving organisations.

The need for skilled and competent managers of volunteers has been a universal catch-cry for decades, alongside attaining due recognition and appreciation for the work entailed in enabling volunteers to play such a huge role in delivering community services.  We are not alone in raising the concerns we have in New Zealand.

The project started from a vision that Managers/Leaders of Volunteers should be valued, well-resourced and competent professionals.  Research and stories of experience was showing managers of volunteers were (and are) struggling for recognition and for resources for professional development.   The flow-on effect was that volunteers may not get the best possible experience from their work, thus impacting on job satisfaction and recruitment, and not least on the services they provide in community organisations.  We were also keen to put paid to the self image of being just a volunteer or just a volunteer manager, phrases which carry the imputation of lesser value than others in the organisation.

What took us so long – in getting to start the project, and then three years of consultation and debate?  The original cry was Enough! following a Volunteering New Zealand conference.  Then we engaged in a collective debate to determine goals and lots of sharing skills and knowledge.  It was an empowering process, encouraging people to respond to the challenges and to think about breaching some of the barriers.  Good things take time, and given the diversity of volunteering and community organisations it was important to discuss plans as widely as possible.

Of course getting a learning pathway to publication stage is not the end of the mission.  Follow-up promotion will be needed, pressing for acceptance and action on recommended practice.  There are plenty of opportunities to meet a range of training needs, but maybe some persuasion will be needed for organisations to see the benefits of supporting professional development – through fee reimbursement or paid study leave, for example.  Managers of volunteers who may be reluctant to take on formal study, can note they could gain credits via Assessment of Prior Learning (APL).

So what will we be seeing in a year’s time?  At the very least, there will be wide-ranging conversations about recognition and training for managers of volunteers.  At the very least, organisations could be acknowledging the relevance and importance of their volunteer programmes, and considering how to enhance them.

Whether by small steps or big strides Volunteering New Zealand has started something that could end up being a whole lot bigger.

February 24, 2013

Cultivating Volunteers

Posted in Marketing, Valuing Volunteers, Youth Volunteering tagged , , , at 4:18 am by Sue Hine

496983747_bade419493Just two months into the year and already there are plenty of agendas being talked up, plenty of rising anxiety levels in community sector organisations, accompanied by what sounds like, and feels like, a sinking lid for programmes and practice.  Paying for criminal checks on volunteers, getting the charities legislation reviewed and the prospect of new contracting and funding arrangements through ‘social bonds’ are just three of the big picture issues.  I shall leave them to other platforms for the moment.

My matter for this week is not as the headline suggests, the community gardeners.  Nor am I presenting yet another promo for best practice volunteer recruitment.  The niggle at the back of my head is the continuing interest in courting Gen X and Y to engage in volunteering, as though it was a new and untapped resource for organisations short on volunteers.

I wrote about Youth Volunteering a bit over a year ago, being enthusiastic about all the evidence of increases in young people’s involvement.  And they continue to be involved, even as part of whole family volunteering.  More recently Volunteering New Zealand has published a paper on UN Youth NZ; Labour Party youth are on a roll this year to connect with local community groups; in January  United Nations announced a trust fund to support Youth Volunteerism.  There is no end to the ways young people can be involved in their communities, and you can see this even at early school years when class projects open children’s minds to community and community needs.

Here is my ‘yes but’ question:

Are we cultivating volunteers or promoting the cult of youth?

The rise in youth volunteering is capturing attention at a time when retirees, the ‘baby-boomer’ generation, could be expected to join the ranks of volunteers in droves.  They are not, for various reasons: they continue in paid employment; they are full-time care-givers for grandchildren; they are travelling the world and ‘pursuing other interests’.  Yet there are still enough older people – and we can see them working in our communities every day throughout the year – to be a significant proportion in volunteer statistics.  This is the expanding age group that is proving such a burden on governments and age-support organisations throughout the western world.  To which I would say: “if you don’t use them, you’ll lose them”.

My plea is for inclusion, for all population groups.  I am thinking of skills that older people can offer from their employment experience.  I am thinking of tolerance and acceptance of difference that comes with age and experience, along with a raft of communication and relationship skills.  Of course they do not have these skills on their own, and nor is the wisdom of age always informed by tolerance.  But neither do young people hold all the answers to achieving organisation goals through volunteering.

Dissonance between age and youth is as old as time.  This is not the time to pitch one in favour of the other.  Volunteering could be the much-needed space where young and older New Zealanders come together to learn from each other and to appreciate the perspectives of different generations.  That’s where leadership for the 21st century could come from.

Disclaimer: Please do not think I am carrying personal angst in writing the above.  By conventional dating I belong to the Silent Generation, those who never spoke out, who accepted everything thrown at them.  I like to think I have moved with my times.

………………

PS:  Comment per email sent by Salle-Ann Ehms:
As always, your blog is very thought-provoking. In the light of inclusiveness, I thought that you’d appreciate this photo I took last week-end. It’s not the best shot but I love the contrasts; youth-aged,
caucasian-asian, able-disabled, but what I most love is that none of those things are really relevant, the caring is palpable. Love it!

February 17, 2013

Volunteer Name-Calling

Posted in Good news stories, Language, Recognition of Volunteering, Valuing Volunteers tagged , , at 1:31 am by Sue Hine

Unsung-Heroes

 

 

I have been collecting a litany of words commonly used as descriptors of volunteering.  There’s quite a selection, and they cover various meanings, from conferring respect and value to some not-so-flattering terms.

Volunteers make the world go round          Backbone of society

Local heroes      Salt of the earth      Good sorts       People power

       Glue / Fabric of the community                        Community Builders

Community collective    Spirit of Community    Community Champions

     Not-for-Profit Institution  Non-Government Organisation

Third sector

              Freebies                Do-gooder                        Lady Bountiful

No doubt there are a few more to add (please do!)  The one that is grabbing my attention at present is Unsung Heroes, a television programme on TVNZ.   Yes, really!  Volunteers are featuring on prime time TV, an extended series show-casing the range and variety of volunteer work in New Zealand.

Most of the major NFP organisations in our communities are represented, and there are some nice pieces on less widely-known charities.  Even the Christchurch Student Army gets a look-in.

What a relief from other reality-TV programmes which too often display the sad, the bad and the downright silliness of human behaviour.  Unsung Heroes hits all the right notes, covering the real activities undertaken by volunteers and including off-the-cuff comments on their motivation.  Mostly the latter is about the feel-good benefits for the volunteer, or the doing-good-in-the-community effect, and once or twice because the volunteer had experienced help from the organisation they have joined.

And yet….  It’s all very well showing off the worthiness of volunteer work, and the achievements of volunteers – but if you haven’t got the background of the organisation, and what it takes to getting a volunteer on the job then you are getting less than half the story.  There’s no show yet of a manager of volunteers, nor the extensive training undertaken by emergency service volunteers and telephone counsellors.  Training has not had a mention in any context.  Or even an induction and orientation.  The series, thus far, has excluded that vast array of informal volunteering that goes under the radar and which really does make the world go round.  It would be nice to see something of Mahi Aroha, and the volunteer effort generated by migrant and refugee communities for supporting their own and for sustaining their cultures.

OK – we can’t have everything, and we should be congratulating NZ On Air for commissioning the programme.  But still I think – why not go a bit further?

What about creating a series based on the drama that is ever present in the life of a manager of volunteers?  Synopsis: follow a valiant manager who herds a bunch of aspiring volunteers through the process of recruitment, training and placement, and what happens to them on the job.  Now there’s a scenario to put management of volunteers on the map!  Because they are our real Unsung Heroes.

February 10, 2013

Marketing a Volunteer Programme

Posted in Best Practice, Marketing, Professional Development tagged , , , at 2:48 am by Sue Hine

Content-MarketingI am old-fashioned enough to still be a regular reader of a daily newspaper, one that has not yet turned to tabloid format.  I reckon it’s a more leisurely way to get my fix of the news.  That includes a browse through the business pages: I look for the columnists who can explain the economy or market trends in plain language.  Often there is good advice for retailers and entrepreneurs.  And the funny thing is, the recommendations could apply equally to NFP organisations.

Marketing and fundraising, for example, are important features of contemporary NFP business plans.  There’s a lot of competition for the charity dollar, and gaining sponsorship or partnering with a for-profit business can require a delicate courtship ballet and some well-honed promotional skills.  Here‘s what is recommended for small retailers and for-profit enterprises:

  • Do everything you can to improve your online presence, website and strong social media representation. 
  • Tune in to today’s market – expectations are changing. 
  • Make sure you include ‘stepping stones’, a range of products and price affordability.
  • Make shopping trips an ‘occasion’ filled with experience, service and old-fashioned hospitality.

It does not take much to translate this advice for promoting a volunteer programme:

  • Get cracking with regular social media entries and pics; make sure the website is specially volunteer-friendly;
  • Heed the current trends in volunteer profiles and adapt to changing expectations;
  • Offer a range of volunteer and donor opportunities and defined commitments; and
  • Remember that quality ‘customer service’ can extend to volunteers as well as service users, and to all organisation relationships.

All familiar stuff we have been talking up for a while now – right?

Trouble is, the ascendance of marketing and fundraising in our sector is pushing volunteering aside, ignoring the potential returns on comparatively low-cost investment in volunteer skills and time – and overlooking the salary costs for those well-paid marketers and fundraisers.  Some of the tales that come to my notice – the shoddy treatment of volunteers by fundraisers, or the last-minute engagement of the manager of volunteers for organising an event – demonstrate a kind of discrimination against volunteering, not to mention the exploitation of volunteer goodwill.

So it has never been more important to get switched on to principles of marketing, to pushing barrows and proclaiming achievements, and to demonstrating the value of our volunteer programmes.  I’ll bet the carpet-bag of management skills carried by volunteer leaders will include patience, tact, empathy, assessment and negotiation – all attributes extolled for fundraising and marketing.  I reckon we could teach those teams a thing or two.

We just have to get out there and do it.  Now!

If you think you need a leg-up to get started just get yourself to the Australasian Retreat for Advanced Volunteer Management in Sydney, March 20-22.  Quite simply, and honestly, it is the best ever opportunity for professional development in managing volunteers, being simultaneously challenging and supportive, and fun.  Try it, and see for yourself.

February 3, 2013

A Back-Handed Lesson (2)

Posted in A Bigger Picture, Best Practice, Managers Matter, Professional Development tagged , , , , at 3:22 am by Sue Hine

if-not-now-then-when-1024x764I did not intend to write a follow-up to last week’s entry, but here’s a real-life story just come to notice.  I think it can teach us a thing or two.

Molly has volunteered for 25 years, delivering meals-on-wheels in a small country town.  She took her turn once a week for two months each year.  She’s a farmer living thirty minutes out of town and unable to volunteer more frequently.  Molly enjoyed the work and the folk she came to know.  Always her work was completed on time, no-one missed out and there were no muddle-ups.

Now Molly is 80 years old and would like to give away her volunteering days.  She is all set to advise the volunteer coordinator accordingly.  But the coordinator has not phoned, has not made contact, has not enquired about Molly’s well-being or otherwise.  So Molly has been cast adrift with never a thank you note to acknowledge the years she has been serving in this rural community.

Too often we hear the tales of agony from managers of volunteers faced with scenarios of elderly volunteers who avoid recognising their age-related deficiencies.  But to abandon a volunteer who has not put a foot wrong by simply ignoring them?  Not on, I say.

Of course Molly might have picked up the phone herself to let the coordinator know she would not be coming back.  Well, I’ve been on the end of such conversations with managers of volunteers and felt the pressure to change my mind, to keep on volunteering because the organisation needs me so badly, is so short of volunteers, and I’m so good at what I do, and the clients just love me.  Molly doesn’t need such flattery.  Nor is she feeling aggrieved, and is not about to blab about her experience to friends and neighbours.  That’s a blessing, because in small town rural New Zealand where people and their business is known to all, that would spell damnation for the coordinator and the service.

The irony is, the coordinator is now delivering meals herself because she is unable to recruit more volunteers.  That’s what we should really be concerned about – the colleague who is struggling, who needs support and probably a heap of good advice.  And there is no Volunteer Centre to call on.  What should we do?  Stand back and watch everything go from bad to worse?  Or take time, find some resources to lend a hand, or at least offer support?

I’ve got some ideas, because I know the area and there’s one or two contacts I can call on.  OK, it could be tricky, but it is important to try.

Because one person’s plight is a bell tolling for all of us in this profession.  Managing volunteers is more than running a good programme – it’s also an occupation that needs muscle and political strategising to maintain respect and value for volunteering.  We need to look out for each other as well as the volunteers.

January 27, 2013

A Back-Handed Lesson

Posted in Best Practice, Leading Volunteers, Recognition of Volunteering, Valuing Volunteers tagged , , at 2:22 am by Sue Hine

employee-relations[1]A couple of weeks ago a colleague reminded me of a paper I had thought interesting enough to copy several years ago.  It was good fortune to find it in the depth of my badly archived resources.

The topic is a perennial conversation among managers of volunteers, that business of establishing and maintaining good relationships between paid staff and volunteers.  There can be lots of agonising on how-to, and what to do when volunteers get a raw deal.

Well, on just one short page, authors Steve McCurley and Rick Lynch turn the discussion on its head. Their paper is titled How to Generate Conflict between Paid Staff and Volunteers.  I can’t find the date of publication, but you can still find the page here.

The recommended advice contradicts everything good practice in managing volunteers would support.  It points up the hazards of relationships, and what can go wrong – specially if the manager gets precious about volunteers.  Here’s what McCurley and Lynch are suggesting:

  • Don’t involve staff in the decisions as to if and how to utilize volunteers within the agency. Everybody loves a surprise.
  • Don’t plan in advance the job descriptions or support and supervision systems for the volunteers. These things will work themselves out if you just give them time.
  • Accept everyone who volunteers for a position, regardless of whether you think they are over-qualified or under-qualified. Quantity is everything.
  • Assume that anyone who volunteers can pick up whatever skills or knowledge they need as they go along.
  • If you do insist on training volunteers, be sure not to include the staff with whom the volunteers will be working in the design of the training.
  • Assume that your staff already knows everything it needs about proper volunteer utilization. Why should they receive any better training than you did?
  • Don’t presume to recognize the contributions that volunteers make to the agency. After all, volunteers are simply too valuable for words.
  • Don’t reward staff who work well with volunteers. They are only doing their job.
  • Don’t let staff supervise the volunteers who work with them. As a volunteer director, you should be sure to retain all authority over ‘your’ volunteers.
  • Try to suppress any problems that come to your attention. Listening only encourages complaints.
  • In case of disputes, operate on the principle that “The Staff is Always Right.” Or operate on the principle of “My Volunteers, Right or Wrong.” This is no time for compromise.

I hope this litany raises more giggles than guilt.  I hope it points out best practice principles in ways that are simple to apply.  Maybe it will generate action to be taken, indicate areas for negotiation, especially around the extent of responsibilities carried by the manager of volunteers.

For example, letting go of direct management could be a strategic way to get paid staff more directly involved with volunteers.  It would bring management closer to volunteers and open up opportunities for ‘volunteer’ team leaders.  Ultimately, devolving direct line-responsibilities could be the stress-and sanity-saver for managers of volunteers.  Just think of the time and energy conserved when there is less effort required for trouble-shooting and peace-keeping.

The bottom line, if you need to be reminded, is a better deal for volunteers, with a side-dressing dollop of greater respect for the role and the skills of the manager of volunteers.

January 20, 2013

Prospecting for a New Year

Posted in A Bigger Picture, Annual Review, Best Practice, Managers Matter tagged , , , , , , , at 3:43 am by Sue Hine

Happy-2013[1]  It’s that time of year for reflection, to look into the pool of 2012 and to assess the prospects for volunteers and their managers in 2013.

Looking good from last year was the continuing increase in numbers of volunteers, especially from youth cohorts. There was a lot more corporate volunteering too.  I was heartened by the increased support and recognition for International Volunteer Managers’ Day (November 5) and for International Volunteer’s Day (December 5).  And it seemed there was greater and more effective use of the e-waves than previously – for recruiting volunteers, for creative news reporting on volunteering, and for producing better and brighter organisation websites.

Volunteering New Zealand stepped up with the publication of Best Practice Guidelines for Volunteer-Involving Organisations, outlining a steer on supporting managers of volunteers, getting the best from a volunteer programme and enhancing organisational attraction for volunteers and paid staff.  I am looking forward to the next publication, the Learning and Development Pathway for managers of volunteers.

But there is no time to rest on our laurels.  At the top of the search list for my blog, again, is Bad Volunteer Experience.   Again, it shows how many people miss out on good practice in management of volunteers.  More disheartening are the continuing accounts of raw deals for managers of volunteers, overburdened and under-appreciated, by organisations that should know better.  So work on promoting and educating on the basics – the essentials – of managing volunteers will continue to be a priority in the coming months.  Business as usual, you might say.

I picked up some signals last year that are going to be my worry-beads for 2013. I am not alone in my concerns:

Volunteering is becoming more transient, more promiscuous, more blurred

Convergence between NFPs and the business sector is not the panacea for all ills

Volunteering is an unloved child generally but was particularly so in 2012

Volunteers are demanding to be led – not managed 

Resources are being drawn away from volunteering for investment in fundraising

These quotes come from different sources and could all be placed under the rubric of The Great Unsettlement.  Here are the features I reckon are the ‘big-picture’ issues:

  • Corporate social responsibility has spawned corporate volunteering, and also sponsorship and partnerships with NFP organisations.  Good stuff, and sensible in cash-strapped times.  Except there is potential risk to maintaining organisation branding and identity if relations with a corporate business are not well-managed.  Worse is the way volunteering and the management of an ongoing volunteer programme seem to be sidelined in preference to scoring big business patronage.  This is particularly evident in marketing and managing fundraising events.
  • ‘Social enterprise’ has risen in popularity stakes as a business model for social outcomes.   Yes, good for the national economy, and more sexy than ordinary everyday volunteering – which (if you need reminding) has promoted social outcomes for generations.  I sigh, because the definition of volunteering is up for debate, again.
  • Government out-sourcing of social services has turned many NFPs into NGOs over the past 30 years, introducing an active if unequal interface between government and community.   Proposals for new models of funding such as social bonds will put a whole new agenda in front of many organisations, again challenging the place and the contribution of a volunteer programme.
  • Accountability, the business of measuring performance, not just inputs and outputs in dollar terms, has been around for a while now.  The current attention to Social Return on Investment (SROI) is more serious, more intense and we’d better get to know about it.  Except the impact of human service delivery is difficult to formulate, expensive to administer, and risks turning volunteering into a commodity.

The political and economic environment rules – OK?  So it seems, and in the process that part of social structure that is called Civil Society, or the Third Sector, or simply ‘the community’ becomes marginalised.  What’s a manager of volunteers to do?

Top of my wish-list for this year is to get beyond the hand-wringing and to turn questions of ‘what can we do?’ into ‘how do we get there?’  Notice how ‘we’ reminds us of the collective and the collaborative approach to action.  There is the stimulus, to seek out allies in local networks and to enlist support from the progressive organisations that were pilots for the Best Practice Guidelines.  Take some leafs from marketing and fundraising strategies: cultivate news media contacts, and never let up on social media plugs.  Become social entrepreneurs in the sense of community-building for social innovation, for volunteering and volunteer organisations.

There are already pockets of volunteering enterprise in various communities.  Just think what volunteering could become if we stitched those pockets into overalls.  There is our challenge for 2013: to gain a stake in the future we need to stake a claim, on our terms, for the territory of community and for volunteering.

December 10, 2012

Obligatory Volunteering

Posted in Language, Recognition of Volunteering tagged , at 3:21 am by Sue Hine

I dug myself a bit of a hole recently when I referred to ‘obligatory volunteering’ during a workshop presentation.  I was using a collective term to include internships, court imposed community sentences, and conditions for receiving welfare payments.  Woops – ‘obligation’ and ‘volunteering’ in the same breath is too much like coercion, and I was presented very smartly with examples to demonstrate that ‘obligatory volunteering’ is a contradiction in terms.

It seems I have challenged the accepted principles of volunteering: that it is unpaid activity undertaken by choice, for the direct benefit of the community or organisation and to the volunteer.   So now I am ‘obliged’ to justify my choice of words.

  • Volunteer Internships with community organisations can be a training requirement for many professional occupations, or for gaining university ‘credits’.  Volunteering England describes a volunteer internship as

a time-limited volunteer placement that allows a person to gain practical experience by undertaking an activity that involves spending time, unpaid, doing something that aims to benefit the environment, individuals or groups other than(or in addition to) close relatives.

  •  Hours of Community Service, as sentenced by the Courts.  There is certainly some compulsion here, in terms of penalties for non-compliance.  But the work is intended to benefit the community and it is unpaid.
  • Welfare beneficiaries: in New Zealand volunteering is encouraged as “a great way to get work experience, learn new skills and help a community”.  But it is also clear that welfare payments are subject to obligations that come with sanctions.

Volunteer Centres can take a lead role in the placement of people coming to volunteering by these different routes.  A purist may argue there is limited or no free will in these contexts, yet people still retain the choice of what sort of work, and which organisation they will work for.  Indeed, they can come knocking at the door to ask about opportunities.  Certainly there is mutual benefit to both volunteer and organisation and many continue volunteering long after the external ‘obligations’ have been met.

Are these conditions so very different from engaging volunteers who come from other directions with a different range of motivations?

Management practice for a volunteer programme may require volunteers to sign a contract related to their work.  There are plenty of codes of practice describing the boundaries of volunteering.  Or there are Rights and Responsibilities charters where expected ‘obligations’ are spelled out for both volunteers and the organisation.

These measures do not carry the weight of a legal contract, nor are they like the marketing ploy of “free quote, no obligation”.  They are simply the means to protect volunteers and the organisation, and service users.

There’s another sense of ‘obligation’ that helps broaden thinking about volunteering.  It’s that age-old moral code of social responsibility – our obligations to each other in our communities.  Survival depended on interdependence in pre-historic times, and still does, in the face of war, famine or natural disaster.  An obligation can also be termed a promise, a duty and a moral commitment.

When you think about it, ‘obligatory volunteering’ comes in different forms and is but one strand of a wide range of activities that we call volunteering.

So let’s be expansive in our interpretations of volunteering, as encouraged by a UNV / Civicus publication Broadening Civic Space through voluntary action: 

a wide range of activities, including traditional forms of mutual aid and self-help, formal service delivery and other forms of civic participation, undertaken of free will, for the general public good and where monetary reward is not the principal motivating factor (UN 2001).

I reckon this scope allows me to include ‘obligatory volunteering’ in the discourse.  I think it is quite useful as a figure of speech to apply to some forms of volunteering.

…………..

This post is the last for 2012.  I’ll be back with New Year reflections late in January.

December 2, 2012

What Do Volunteers Want?

Posted in Best Practice, Celebrations, Leadership, Recognition of Volunteering, Valuing Volunteers tagged , , at 4:10 am by Sue Hine

IVDay

It’s coming to your place this week, this annual splurge to celebrate volunteers and volunteering.  It’s a day established back in 1985 by United Nations General Assembly to:

Promote the work of volunteer-involving organisations and individual volunteers   

Promote their contributions to development at local, national and international levels.

There’ll be civic functions and a ministerial speech or two, maybe presentations of service awards, and lots of nice words said about volunteers and their work.  We can say thank you forever, and of course we do that a lot more than one day a year.

Big question: Will International Volunteer Day really be about promoting the work of volunteers and their contribution?  Saying thank you is not the same as doing a marketing programme.

Second question: Has anyone thought about what volunteers really want?  Has anyone asked volunteers this question?  Not why they volunteer, but what volunteers think is important to get the best out of their volunteering.  Because in the midst of all the applause for volunteers on December 5 I know there are continuing complaints about volunteering that does not go well.

Here is a check list for measuring expectations:

  1. I want to know what the organisation stands for, its mission and values – who, and what, I will be working for.  And I want to know what is expected of a volunteer.
  2. I want information about volunteer opportunities, job outlines, training programmes and support.  That training had better be good too, for me to do a good job.
  3. I’m happy to fill in all the forms, answer the questions, reveal all that info that can be checked via an official database, and I want to know why you want all these details, and the about the security of your security systems.  (Disasters in other fields in New Zealand this year have made me a bit nervous.)
  4. Yes, I shall complete all the training, but please explain why that health and safety stuff is important, even if all I will be doing is making cups of tea.
  5.  I would really like to be buddied with another volunteer until I feel confident in doing what you expect of me.
  6. That’s why knowing about back-up is so important.  Can I get answers, have a conversation, feel free to call in when I need to?
  7. I want to feel included, in the volunteer programme and in the work of the organisation, so I never have to say “I’m just a volunteer”.
  8. It would be good to know what my rights are too.  Do I dare lay a complaint if things go wrong?
  9. I get a real buzz when people say ‘thank you’ to me – service users and staff – and it’s also nice to go to those functions like IVDay where I can meet up with other volunteers.  Please keep this up!
  10. I really like the newsletters that keep me informed on what is happening in the organisation, always including a bit about volunteers.  And yes, I follow the Facebook page too.

That’s the basic stuff I go for when I volunteer.  I had to learn it the hard way, through the best of times and the worst of times.

That’s how I learned about management of volunteers too.  And I keep on learning from volunteers who tell me what they want.

One more thing – there’s a lot to be learned when volunteers are asked some good questions in an annual survey, and specially when they leave.

 

Previous page · Next page

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers