February 23, 2014

Good News, Bad News

Posted in Best Practice, Good news stories, Managing Volunteers, Valuing Volunteers tagged , , at 3:11 am by Sue Hine

133847564[1]

 

Two items referring to volunteering turned up in my news reading this past week.  One cast a slur on the meaning of ‘volunteer’ and the other described volunteers as ‘committed staff’.

The bad news story is about a man who drove a pub’s courtesy van and undertook other tasks on request from staff.  He was paid $50 per shift, but did not have an employment contract despite repeated requests.  The hotel’s new owner decided the man’s services were no longer required and a text message was sent to that effect.  However, our man took his case to the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) to claim unpaid wages and compensation for unfair dismissal.  The hotel owner argued the man was “just a lonely elderly volunteer”.

To be dismissive of volunteers in this way is enough to start a protest march, a vigil outside the hotel, or a boycott of the pub’s services.  Or all three!  The protest can be generated on several counts:

  • Nobody is ever ‘just a volunteer’
  • Not all volunteers are lonely and elderly
  • Neither are all older volunteers lonely
  • Not to mention demonstrably shoddy HR practice

There is a good ending to this story.  The ERA decided our man was a regular on-call casual employee: he was paid regularly for regular work days and he answered to a manager.  The dismissal was found to be unjustified and monetary compensation duly awarded.

I am hoping that the hotel’s owner will heed two important messages from this experience.  Firstly, volunteer work is not to be taken lightly: it is an honourable commitment that should be valued regardless of age and status.  Secondly, and possibly more important, is the fair and professional practice of HR management.  Volunteers and paid workers might be simply the labour inputs for a business, but employers need to apply a duty of care to both those resources.

The next story offers much better news.  The International Rugby Sevens was hosted in Wellington a couple of weeks ago, an annual party event that has been going on for fifteen years.  This year misbehaviour and drunkenness by a small proportion of the crowd got more media attention than New Zealand’s team carrying off another tournament win.  Yet the event was still counted a success, attributed to “300 committed staff … the vast majority of them volunteers”.  There speaks a manager who understands the parity status of paid employees and volunteers.  He adds:

“All of them are dedicated to our values – being passionate about Wellington; delivering excellence (which includes learning from our mistakes) and teamwork.”

There will be many managers of volunteers who can applaud the people they work with for the similar qualities.  Wouldn’t it be great if more organisations could proclaim equal status on these grounds for volunteers and their paid staff?

About these ads

3 Comments »

  1. Amy Hamilton said,

    Hi Sue,

    In my volunteer led organization, we have tried calling our volunteers, staff. Our volunteers truly do not like this term. They feel that they definitely want to be distinguished between being paid and being unpaid. I agree that volunteers must be treated with the highest respect but I feel that they also want it to be known that they are not there for a paycheck. It’s a sticky situation but I feel that if you as an organization show your appreciation and support to volunteers, they will be retained and happy.

    Thanks for your work!
    Amy

    • Sue Hine said,

      I’m delighted to hear that volunteers are proud of their title Amy. I am thinking too that being treated with the highest respect is another good reason to be called a volunteer. And the pay-off, as you say, is the good retention rate.

  2. Hi Sue! I love the two contrasts here. Perhaps if organizations would stop saying “staff and volunteers” and sometimes mix it up by saying “volunteers and staff”, it would elevate the volunteer role at least a bit. I can only hope!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 121 other followers

%d bloggers like this: